There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
Item Details | Price |
---|
Tue Nov 28, 2023
Q. In the context of the changing Indian society, how do you view Andre Beteille's conceptions of harmonic and disharmonic social structures? (2022)
Andre Beteille has proposed a distinction between two kinds of stratification systems which he calls 'harmonic' and 'disharmonic'.
He defines the 'harmonic' social structures as follows:Further, caste was organized on the principle of cumulative inequalities.The higher castes owned vested lands and were axial points in political matters, while the untouchables being low in caste hierarchy were debarred from political and economic participation. The Jajmani system demonstrates the functioning of such a harmonic system.
Also, this was legitimized by scriptures. Through the Guna theory, Brahmanism seeks to justify the social hierarchy of the varna system (hitherto taken for granted) in terms of different qualities and capacities of the individuals.
In modern times, however, the unleashing of democratic politics, industrialisation, education, secularization of society, migration and such social forces has led to disturbance in this balance. It has disturbed the harmonic system leading to disharmonic systems.
He defines the 'disharmonic' social structures as follows:
Thus, Beteille's concept of harmonic and disharmonic systems provides us with an insightful understanding of the complexities of social stratification systems. It breaks the common myth that modern societies are more egalitarian and harmonic than ancient and medieval societies.
Team LearnSociology
A team of experts crafting insightful sociology study resources.